For Research

Letter XLVII
1. By what process could slaves become free citizens in ancient Rome?

      Slavery in ancient Roman society was different than slavery in America. Although in both circumstances, the slaves were treated harshly, the difference was the fact that the roman slaves could be granted freedom, or manumission. Most slaves in Rome were let go by there owners outright, and were freed that way. Another way they were freed is that they were able to buy their freedom from their owner. That process might have taken a while, but once done, they were free. This was known as informal manumission. Formal manumission was being freed by a magistrate. (manumission )
            The difference in informal and formal manumission is what happened after the slave was freed. The informally freed slave would have fewer rights, wasn't a citizen, and would have to give everything they owned back to their owner when they died. The formally freed slave was a citizen, but couldn't run for office. Also the formally freed slave's children would be considered full citizens and could run for office. (manumission

Sources
1. Manumission, Slaves and Freemen, www.pbs.org
   

For research Constitution

2. Why did the Anti- Federealist demeand a bill of rights be added to the Constitution?

The Constitution initially started off as being too weak, so The Anti-federealist demanded a bill of rights because they thought the central government would get to be to strong, and the bill of rights would protect the citizens from being taken advantage of.  They did this after the Articles of Confederation was put in place and gave the central government too much power.
    In order to get the new Constitution ratified, and everyone be satisfied, the Anti-Federalist argued for the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights would guarantee that the president wouldn't become a monarch, and the citizens of America would have their rights.

Sources
1. Cox, Kathryn, Apush
2. Federalist and Anti-Federalist, www. library.thinkquest.org
3. Feinberg, Barbara, Explaining the bill of Rights, www. schoolastic.com

For Research Question

Hortensia's Protest
2. Research a nineteenth- or twentieth-century example of refusal to pay a tax as a form of political protest. What was being protested? was the goal of protest achieved?

I am obviously going to choose Henry David Thoreau. He is a transcendentalist of the 19th century, and one of the most famous tax protester.  He was protesting the Mexican American War, because he felt that it was spreading slavery. He didn't feel like he should pay for, nor support a cause he didn't believe in. As a result, he was jailed, and in jail is where he wrote Civil Disobedience. The goal of the protest wasn't exactly achieved because the war still went on, but as a result of his essay, his message was spread, and it influenced many of the great leaders today.

Sources
1. Urban, Christopher, English
2. Cox, Kathryn, APUSH

Limerick

Well, that was not surprising in the least.

1. I think the people that are mad about Frank McCourt's memoir are fair in their judgement. I mean, nobody wants their dirty laundry aired out. It's fine when only the people who live in the town, and maybe a few towns over know of your poor conditions, but when the whole entire world knows, its embarrassing. I think they are completely fair. The people in the novel aren't fair because they are just being prejudice

2. Well, I don't think my neighbors would be mad because I live in a fairly quite neighborhood. The people surrounding me wouldn't be too upset because for one, Fayetteville isn't a dump, and two, my memoir wouldn't really include anyone but my immediate family

"Knavery's plain face is never seen till used."

There are some people in this world that are truthful and will follow whatever the leader says to do. These people will always say what they mean and mean what they, and will get nowhere in life. I am not one of these people. I am the type of person to smile in your face to get what I want. I will do whatever is necessary to advance myself. I have a hidden agenda, and am not what I appear , and I feelbad for whoever is in my way. I will hide my true intentions and those who don't are fools. I am not who I appear to be.

His reasons would be the fact that he thinks Othello slept with his wife, the fact that he gave Cassio the job he felt he deserved, and that his reputation could be potentially ruined.  There are no true evidence about Othello sleeping with his wife. He says things like,And it is thought abroad that ’twixt my sheets, he’s done my office. I know not if ’t be true, but I, for mere suspicion in that kind, will do as if for surety. Which means he's heard rumors, doesn't know if they're true, but suspicion and his gut feeling is enough.

insults

1.Thou art a loggerheaded, tardy-gaited measle.
      Translation you are a stupid, late developing insignificant being
2.Forsooth! Thou art a vacant, weak-hinged dewberry
      Translation: Heavens! You are an empty minded, weak bodied idiot
3.Verily, thou art not but a roynish, plum-plucked rudesby.
       Translation: You are nothing but a two faced, untrustworthy weasel.
4. Thou art a yeasty swag bellied younker.
       Translation: You are lazy, fat good for nothing person.
5. Ye ruttish tickle-brained hemspeed.
       Translation: You dumb, stupid idiot.

p.a.s.s.

1. He does  this to give the reader a visual as to where he is. He defines his audience so that it is clear as to who he is writing to.
2.He says men of genuine good will so that they know why he decided to write back to their criticism. It is ironic in a sense of the two contradicting descriptions, but not because even if a person does something others believe isn't the best decision, they could be they did it for a good reason
3.What suggests this is the fact that he goes off into other topics, and explaining why he does what he does, not just for this event.
4.His thesis is at the end of the first paragraph, and it is stated

1.He does this in the first paragraph
2.In my opinion, it is throughout the entire letter
3.He uses the word but in many of his transitions, before, and I hope, moreover
4.He uses these other religions to strengthen his argument of oppression, and overcoming that oppression
5.He uses this  strategy to show how some of the great philosophers has influenced his practice of nonviolent protest and his way of thinking.
6."You may well ask, " Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches, and so forth," this leads into his argument of his practices. The 14th paragraph is deductive because it concludes the inductive part that i stated.
7. He does this by reminding them that they are all christian, and that he hopes in the future things could be better. He does accomplish this.

Comprehension Questions

1. Dr. King doesn't answer any criticism because he feels it takes up too much time to answer the many critics. He answered them because he felt it was genuine.

2. I think that they feel this way because D.r King and his followers didn't have a permit to march, and it only landed them in jail.

3. He is doing his demonstrations because he was asked to and there is injustice.

4. He says that wait means never

5.The laws he defines are just and unjust. The difference is that just are laws that everyone obeys, and unjust is laws that only a certain group of people have to obey.

6. He finds it illogical because all of his efforts has been nonviolent, and many follow that practice.

7.He is disappointed in the white church's leadership and the fact that they do not help the cause.

Tim and Antony's funeral speech were very similar in rhetoric. Both repeated names and things that had occurred, and why the person that was dead died. In each speech, they started off calm, and ended up passionate about what they were saying. In both situations, they incited a riot, and inspired people to be enlightened on a subject they already knew, but didn't want to admit. The main difference in the speeches is that Antony knew exactly what he was doing, and Tim did not. Antony had planned what he was going to say, and knew how to manipulate the citizens into doing what he wanted. On the other hand, Tim had no intentions on giving a speech, and had no clue what his words would ignite.

Letter To Mary

Dear Mary,
      I am so sorry that I left without an explanation. I am ashamed of how I left, and of the fact that I will never see you again. The details of my departure will have to remain a mystery, but I will be able to give you a basic overview. As it turns out, I have taken your advice, and became a leader for the black community. I am not permitted to tell you how, or for which organization, just know that my actions will lead to great things, and hopefully many changes. I will always remember your gracious soul, and I will remember how you taught me to be proud of where I'm from, and always be humble about where I'm going. You will forever be in my thoughts, and I hope that you will remain healthy and prosperous.
                                                                          Gratefully,
                                                                                   Tim
P.S: I'm sorry about the bank in my room, hopefully it wasn't anything sentimental.

Thanks to modern science ad

I'm not exactly sure what the ad was supposed to convince me of, I suppose it would be not having a death penalty, so that's what my journal will be about.

ACLU,
     I have read your ad on Modern Science and the death penalty, and although your argument has valid points, I have to disagree with the overall view. I agree with the fact that the system is flawed in some ways, but to get rid of the death penalty for a few mistakes is unrealistic. In your ad, it was mentioned that 17 were freed due to the advancements of science , and 23 were proven to be killed unlawfully. No where in your ad did it say how many were rightfully convicted and sentenced to death for the heinous crime that they committed. Nor did it did not state how many cases DNA proved people already behind bars were rightfully convicted. Studies have shown that those rightfully convicted outweigh those that weren't. Even though the justice system isn't perfect, the advancement of Modern Science is more of a help to convict and punish the right people, than it frees those who aren't . Therefore, your argument that the death penalty is a civil injustice because of the sheer number of those wrongly convicted becomes obsolete compared to those that weren't.

journal entry(the storm)

I think that the title can also be referring to the storm of emotionns that Calixta and Alcee were feeling. The were reminiscing about old times and all of a sudden that felt a downpour of emotions ,like rain in a storm, that they couldn't control. After they acted on their emotions, they went their separate and the feelings passed just as a storm does when all the wind and rain is gone.

Good night and good luck

Speaker: the speaker wasnt really defined, and I don't recall a narrator. If I had to choose I would say Murrow and Friendly.
Occasion: The occasion was the 50s and the whole communist and McCarthy era
Audience: the audience would be the people of today.
Purpose: I think that the movie was made to try and prevent and remind people not to repeat past mistakes
Tone: the tone was serious, stressful and extremely dry.

The crucible

well... not how I wanted it to end, but since it never really said that John was hanged, I'm just gonna pretend that he escaped somehow and he and Elizabeth ran away together. With that said, lets get into characters. First off, I really,really dislike Abigail. She is a delusion, homewreaking nut job that deserves to be locked up in the looney bin. Did she honestly think that John was going to come running back to her after she got half the town hanged? Really? The icing on the cake was when she and Mercy just go quietly into the night after they figure out this isn't going to work out in Abigail's favor. Next is Elizabeth and John, as you may know by now, I'm a sucker for a happy ending, so I was really disappointed with what ended up happening. It's obvious that unless the town is over its hysteria by the time Elizabeth gives birth, she will be hanged too. Which is sad because that leaves 4 children orphaned for stupidity. Mary Warren, Oh!(clap) My!(clap) God!(clap) if she wasn't such a follower and didn't sew the gosh darn poppet, Elizabeth and John wouldn't have been in this mess.As for the other characters, either I didn't like them, or I don't feel as though they play a big enough role for me to mention.Overall I liked how Miller was able to bring forth the issues of his time through the issues of the Salem Witch times. I actually felt the whole McCarthyism vibe, even though I was being entertained.

Half hanged mary

Speaker-the speaker is Margaret Atwood, but the point of view is from Mary Webster.
Occasion- the occasion was teh Salem Witch trials. Mary was accused of being aa witch, she denied so she was hanged. She stayed on the tree all night and in the morning was let free.
Audience-There is no specific audience, but I can assume that Margaret is maybe writing to the people thaat hung MAry to let them know that Mary won. Also to let them know that now Mary really will be a witch. She might also be writing to everyone to let them know of the happenings of Mary's time.
Purpose- The purpose of this poem was to show how even though she was accused, she was not broken. She stood up for her beliefs instead of saying anything to get herself out of trouble. She also wanted to inform everyone know how women could be labled as witches because of how they looked or because of the simple fact they were unmarried.
Subject-The subject of the piece was Mary being hanged and surviving.
Tone-The tone of the poem was gloomy, mad, hurt,and semi-spiritual.

Are you now or were you ever

1. He attempted to make life real again through his play by making a sattire about the whole McCarthysim ordeal. He attemmpted to bring the real issues with McCarthy and the communist in an entertaining way. In his own way, Miller was saying that McCarthy was basically doing witch hunts.
2.HIs criticism was that the left side demanded that the right side of government validaate their politcal views and when the right side asked the same of the left, they remained silent. Paul Robeson's testimony put to liight what many Americans were still in the dark about.
3.The theme would be realizations. This relates because that was the entire point of The Crucible. The purpose was for Americans to realize what was happpening with McCarthyism.
4.What he means is that people can be easily brainwashed into believing what others want them to believe. What is so vital to remember is right and wrong, and also common sense

Journal entry #4

The difference between the impact of the mural and the impact of the photo is that the mural is subjective and the photograph is objective. The point of the photograph was to showcase the mural, and the point of the mural was to get the viewer to remember 911. The most moving in my opinion was the photograph because not only does it showcase the mural and what it stands for, but it shows that people care enough to stop and take a picture.Im sure the litttle black girls play a role too, because if they didn't, they wouldnt be in the photo.Im just not deep enough to try and figure out exactly what the purpose is.

Writing Workshop #1

There was really only one time that I can remember when I went against my beliefs. I usually don't do what I feel isn't right, but at the time I didn't feel I had a choice. It was in the third grade, and I was looking at my friend's bear. One of my other friend's had cut the ear off, and the owner of the bear had gotten really upset. I knew who had cut the ear off, but instead of telling the teacher who, I decided to lie because I didn't want to lose a friend.

Journal Entry #3

I believe that Orwell is a complete and utter coward because of what he did to the elephant. Instead of standing up for himself and choosing a different route, he chose to shoot the elephant because he didn't want to be laughed at. With regards to being a racist, in that situation, I'm sure many of the Burman viewed him as a racist, but in my opinion, he's not.

Scarlet Letter

I actually enjoyed this book. In the beginning, I had my doubts, but soon the story started to pick up. Towards the middle, I found myself yelling, " oh no he didn't," or " I knew he was the baby daddy." I really enjoyed the character Hester. Throughout the book, she held her head high, and took the punishment as noble as anyone could in that situation. Dimmesdale didn't anger me as much as I thought he would when his role in the novel was revealed. I understood why he didn't tell, but that doesn't make him less of a coward. Chillingworth, in my opinion, should have left well enough alone. He should have just went back to wherever he came from and found himself another wife. I don't see the purpose of torturing another man for a woman who never loved him in the first place. At the end, when I read that Hester and Arthur had planned to runaway together, I was so happy, until I found out Chillingworth planned on joining them. At the end of the novel, I was thoroughly disappointed that Dimmesdale died. I was more mad at the fact that Hester didn't get her happy ending with her love, but it was a great book nonetheless.

Journal Entry #2

I have taken many a class I have felt was pointless. Particularly every single math class after the fifth grade. I don't feel, nor do I ever thing that I would ever feel that I need to know what the area of a triangle is, or that I would ever use synthetic division in my everyday life. I feel that these classes are pointless and without value, especially seeing as how Pythagorean theorem  has nothing to do with my future career. The only possible scenario I would look back and say," hmmm... I am really glad I know what inverse variation is", is when I'm helping my kid with their homework; even then, probably not.

Civil Disobedience

1. A laissez-faire government commands my respect because it takes more to trust the nation to do the right, rather than dictate its every movements.
2. The motto he believes in is " That government is best which governs least." He would probably like to see the government ease on the control it has in on a nation.
3. Thoreau thinks the best kind of government is a government that doesn't govern. The Americans will get the best kind of government when every man make known what kind of government would command his respect. 
4. Thoreau is everyone to speak up. His argument is convincing, and makes me think.
5. My argument would be that too little government would cause chaos. My examples would be countries that had a weak government and didn't succeed. 

Self Reliance

1. 1. In today's culture, self reliance, in the terms of the church has flourished. Many people don't believe that God is the only answer any more, and many are looking inward for answers. When it comes to what is considered the social norm, many people still try to stay inside what is normal.  Many don't want to be misunderstood, even though according to Emerson, that means greatness.
2. The terms Emerson uses to describe society are conspiracy and joint-stock company. According to Emerson, society's main purpose is to destroy self- reliance and to conform everyone.  Emerson thinks that people should be affected positively in the way people view them.
3. The scientists, philosophers, and religious thinkers were all misunderstood. The evidence he gives are names of misunderstood people that made major differences in the world.
4. His use of the word foolish is important because it shows just how strongly he feels about the topic. I think that the only time he would advocate consistency is when he is saying be consistently spontaneous or misunderstood.
5. He feels the divine providence has already set a path for you. I think that he would say everyone's reason for living would be to contribute something different to the world, and to be one's own person.
6. I would choose his speak what you think statement because if you always say what you feel, no matter what you said yesterday, someone will always listen. 

Journal Entry #1

In the city of Queens, New York,The Vulture is flying high in the sky after defeating the mighty Spider-rman.The Vulture is busy robbing the town's bank, when out of nowhere, Spider-man swoops down and tangles him up in his web.The Vulture easily escapes, grabs Spider-man, and drops him in the water tank. While The Vulture flies away, Spidey is stuck in the tank pondering his next move. Spider-man tries shoot his web, but remembers that he forgot to refill it this morning. He tries climbing the walls, but it is too wet. Finally, using his super strength, Spidey is able to break free. Meanwhile, The Vulture is back at the bank, still trying to steal the money. Again, Spider-man swoops in, this time kicking The Vulture down. The cops come and justice prevails once more.